switch_root: failed to unlink ro_branch still present on rc3 #137
Labels
No labels
Done
bug
buildiso
buildpkg
buildtree
critical
deployiso
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
in progress
invalid
manjaro-chroot
note
old-not-relevant
optional
question
sonar
todo
wontfix
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
tools/manjaro-tools#137
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Created by: NuLogicSystems
Can we please see if we can fix this?
Not that this message is critical, it's just annoying.
Created by: philmmanjaro
Why, it doesn't hold us back to boot the image. If you find time to debug it, fine. At the moment it is low prio on my end.
Created by: NuLogicSystems
I accidentally hit the wrong button, Clemens doesn't want to see this error.
Created by: philmmanjaro
Here is an really old take on the matter. Do you still use aufs on your end?
Created by: philmmanjaro
Also here the part of the aufs manual:
Current aufs config can be found here.
Created by: philmmanjaro
However, we might even try the Ubuntu-way:
Created by: Kirek
the message is still there with overlayfs
Created by: philmmanjaro
We might need to take a look at our hooks as in:
Created by: NuLogicSystems
Yes I'm using overlayfs as well.
Created by: NuLogicSystems
This could also be what is causing the plymouthd issue:
If you sets initramfs as an aufs branch and boot your
system by switch_root, you will meet a problem easily since the
files in initramfs may be inaccessible.
Created by: philmmanjaro
For more info on the hooks you can take also a look here
Created by: NuLogicSystems
I'll have to look at that when I have time to sit and read it. ;)
Created by: NuLogicSystems
On a side note: have you already looked at systemd 2.2.5's switch to take the place of su?
Created by: Kirek
Its 225 :)
Yes, I looked at machinectl shell, though it doesn't replace the su binary or anything like that, even if it does almost the same thing.
Created by: NuLogicSystems
So it does almost the same thing but not the same thing. Hmm, interesting, I'll need to do some reading when I get a chance. :)
Created by: Kirek
Look are the original issue about that: https://goo.gl/ZGvjNM
Created by: philmmanjaro
Well, I searched a lot. switch_root apparently only works on true initrd (cpio style, not using squashfs). So one option would be to silence switch_root in the init hook on livecd-kernel-image. Archlinux don't has it as they use dmsnapshot.
Created by: NuLogicSystems
Excuse me for not being knowledgeable on such things, but what is the advantage of squashfs?
And is there another option other than switch_root?
Created by: philmmanjaro
switch_root root works, but creates those warnings with squashfs. However using dmsnapshot in combination seems to make it work. However aufs and overlayfs might have some issues as you can read ;)
Created by: NuLogicSystems
So, have you decided how to proceed on this issue yet?
Created by: philmmanjaro
There is no issue. It is just a warning message ...
Created by: NuLogicSystems
Yes, but is there a way we can suppress it for now?
Created by: philmmanjaro
What do you think I'm trying to do for 3 hours?
Created by: NuLogicSystems
I wasn't saying that, I know you've been working hard on it.
I was just wondering if you've found anything yet. ;)
I do apologize if I unintentionally offended.