What approach to evaluate edition? #152

Closed
opened 2015-11-23 19:15:23 +00:00 by philm · 1 comment
philm commented 2015-11-23 19:15:23 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab2.manjaro.org)

Created by: udeved

We got basically two possible takes on evaluating the edition type.

a) tie it to a buildset
disadvantage: we can't really distinguish eg sonar with that, since they have gnome/mate "community overlay"

b) have a profile based var edition_type
disadvantage: we would have to run deployiso in the profile dir, which wouldn't matter if buildiso ran deployiso after build

I changed from a) to b).

edition_type would also represent the upload category.

Any thoughts or different approach?

*Created by: udeved* We got basically two possible takes on evaluating the edition type. a) tie it to a buildset disadvantage: we can't really distinguish eg sonar with that, since they have gnome/mate "community overlay" b) have a profile based var edition_type disadvantage: we would have to run deployiso in the profile dir, which wouldn't matter if buildiso ran deployiso after build I changed from a) to b). edition_type would also represent the upload category. Any thoughts or different approach?
philm commented 2015-11-26 15:50:00 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab2.manjaro.org)

Created by: udeved

Do we want $arch subdirs per iso edition?

*Created by: udeved* Do we want $arch subdirs per iso edition?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
tools/manjaro-tools#152
No description provided.