Investigate and possibly fix on btrfs #168

Closed
opened 2015-12-28 19:23:16 +00:00 by philm · 6 comments
philm commented 2015-12-28 19:23:16 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab2.manjaro.org)

Created by: udeved

buildiso seems to be in need for some special btrfs code.
Reports on forum indicate, something subvolume doesn't get mounted.

https://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=29267

*Created by: udeved* buildiso seems to be in need for some special btrfs code. Reports on forum indicate, something subvolume doesn't get mounted. https://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=29267
philm commented 2015-12-29 10:26:45 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab2.manjaro.org)

Created by: philmmanjaro

Well, to test it somebody has to create a btrfs partition. Maybe build inside a virtual machine ;)

*Created by: philmmanjaro* Well, to test it somebody has to create a btrfs partition. Maybe build inside a virtual machine ;)
philm commented 2015-12-29 14:17:14 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab2.manjaro.org)

Created by: philmmanjaro

Seems to be also related to this matter: https://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=27438.0

*Created by: philmmanjaro* Seems to be also related to this matter: https://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=27438.0
philm commented 2016-01-01 04:32:44 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab2.manjaro.org)

Created by: ryanvade

btrfs subvolumes are under heavy rewrites and most of the developers are not considering it stable at the moment until kernel 4.5. There is also a bug with systemd 228 (systemd-tmpfiles) and btrfs subvolumes in the Arch core repo. Maybe these bugs are related?

https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg48899.html

*Created by: ryanvade* btrfs subvolumes are under heavy rewrites and most of the developers are not considering it stable at the moment until kernel 4.5. There is also a bug with systemd 228 (systemd-tmpfiles) and btrfs subvolumes in the Arch core repo. Maybe these bugs are related? https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg48899.html
philm commented 2016-01-01 13:07:06 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab2.manjaro.org)

Created by: philmmanjaro

Maybe. Most of manjaro-tools is developed on openrc. Most users use systemd. We will look into it.

*Created by: philmmanjaro* Maybe. Most of **manjaro-tools** is developed on **openrc**. Most users use **systemd**. We will look into it.
philm commented 2016-01-05 20:32:01 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab2.manjaro.org)

Created by: udeved

On the forums, eugen tested, and it seems to be a systemd thingy.
He said it builds fine on openrc with btrfs.

*Created by: udeved* On the forums, eugen tested, and it seems to be a systemd thingy. He said it builds fine on openrc with btrfs.
philm commented 2016-01-06 07:01:29 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab2.manjaro.org)

Created by: philmmanjaro

Yep, it is a known issue with systemd. See also the post from @ryanvade.

*Created by: philmmanjaro* Yep, it is a known issue with **systemd**. See also the post from @ryanvade.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
tools/manjaro-tools#168
No description provided.